What kind of entity is the Church of Sweden (CoS) when engaged
in activities with partners internationally? Are we a Non-Governmental
Organisation (NGO), a Faith-Based Organisation (FBO) or something else?
Steve de Gruchy died in 2010 while tubing on the Mooi River with his son. |
In 2012 a book was published in Honour of Steve de Gruchy,
former Dean of our School:
Living on the Edge. Essays in Honour of Steve de Gruchy Activist & Theologian.
The book is edited by James R Cochrane, Elias
Bongmba, Isabel Phiri, and Des van der Water. Cluster Publications.
Pietermaritzburg.
In one of the essays "Faith Amid Turbulent Currents on a Living
River" Gary Gunderson writes about the ARHAP (African Religious Health Assets
Programme). This programme distinguishes between FBO’s and FFE’s. FFE stand
for: Faith Forming Entity. Gunderson writes:
FBO’s are nearly always organized around a temporal, functional purpose that tends to downplay the most distinctive thing of relevance to those in them, which is to express the faith nurtured in their particular FFE.
As an employee of the International Department of the CoS I sometimes
ask myself questions based on this distinction. If we go back in the history of
the CoS we have traditionally tried to hold together the two: we are both an
agency that seeks to transform the lives of people through the kind of temporal
programmes that Gunderson speaks about. At the same time we are a church, with
all its implications.
The Facebook page of our international department does not
even describe us as an FBO. It says that we are an NGO. To me, that is a
concern.
'Svenska kyrkans internationella arbete' means 'the Church of Sweden's International Work'. |
The FFE concept is useful to me. It shows that there is a tension
between different aspects in our international work. I believe it has to be.
Other churches have solved this by having one organisation for aid (like the Norwegian Church Aid) which is not the same thing as the Church of Norway.
My points here are:
1. The Church of Sweden International Work is definitely not a non-governmental organisation (NGO). I hope this will be changed on the Facebook-page.
2. I agree that we need to live in the tension between being a faith-based organisation (FBO) and a faith forming entity (FFE).
3. It takes two to tango. Church relations are important if we are going to live up to our vision to be both an FBO and an FFE. In our Church relations we connect to roots both in the congregations of the CoS and deep down in our partner churches.
In the School of Religion, Philosophy and Classics at the UKZN we try to keep this together. Many of my colleagues
describe themselves as at the same time church people, activists and academics.
Yes, there are tensions from time to time but it is impossible to separate
those aspects. As the CoS we have a lot to learn from this.
2 comments:
I agree with you Anders. THis is something we shoult talk abaout att the summer meeting in Sigtuna.
In Latinamerica beeing a church means also beeing an activist, a social worker or a development worker. All together. Why can´t we do the same?
In my opinion, CoS´s identity is also a theolgical question.
/Adriana
That's why were are sent to Latin America and Southern Africa (as well as to other regions in the worldwide church): to gain knowledge and experiences from our sisters and brothers in other contexts. Thank you, Adriana!
Post a Comment